Physics & Electromagnetism : The Domain Theory of Magnetism
October 11, 2010 by Actaphysica
Filed under Archive
Domains are large areas in ferromagnets in which the magnetism of the individual atoms and molecules are all aligned in the same direction. Discover how ferromagnetic material becomes magnetic with help from a science teacher in this free video on magnetism and physics. Expert: Steve Jones Contact: www.marlixint.com Bio: Steve Jones is an experienced mathematics and science teacher. Filmmaker: Paul Volniansky
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Hannes Alfven, Kristian Birkeland www.plasmacosmology.net www.thunderbolts.info www.plasmauniverse.com Astronomy Plasma Cosmology Electric Universe Astrophysics Nobel Prize winners Wal Thornhill Dave Talbott Anthony Peratt Halton Arp Charles Bruce Eric Lerner Red Shift Redshift Big Bang Thunderbolts of The Gods Electricity in space The Universe Cosmos Empiricism Real science
![The Dark Matter & Dark Energy [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rLmcbjLVPKc/default.jpg)
Thank you so much you are helping me in my 11U Physics Class, Cheers
[Reply]
The big Oil corporations are trying their best to stop free energy ideas from spreading to common ppl.
We need to put an end to this corruption ,start generating your own electricity now.
Visit LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints . Join the Revolution!!
[Reply]
Yes indeed they are alive…magnetism is awareness of plasma and they operate within each individual ‘I’…That is what third eye is all about _ individual electromagnetic center which could hold plasma _ enlightenment!
Computer needs electricity… so does the Moon _ Outer magnetic conductor for the current _ to turn on and work…in other words our blood plasma is frozen within the moon as if male freezes inside female to manifest body on earth…
[Reply]
@petriedishxscapee If you read alot, then it seems you must be very educated. It’s probably the best and most responsible to take your education (and the programming of your mind) into your own hands.
[Reply]
Wonderful informative & animation!
[Reply]
@ammasdevotee See my Tesla video
[Reply]
This is similar to the history of cancer research. Science sure surges and backtracks, often ignoring the founders of a movement.
[Reply]
you might want to examine Tesla.
[Reply]
You should look at Kivelson and Russell’s Introduction to Space Physics for more about the field of space physics since I think this is more the field you are interested in.
But nice video… and I agree with you that the field of astronomy does tend to vastly over simplify problems.
[Reply]
The reason fluid mechanics is used to explain things is because while we know equations such as the Vlasov equation are reality, we do not have the computing power needed to compute such an equation. Thus we have found my modeling the system in a magneto-hydrodynamical system (MHD) we can simulate most of the phenomena we observe until we can get better technology.
[Reply]
If you look at the field of space plasma physics you will see more E&M. Electricity is only ignored here when solar wind is tenuous enough so that the charged electrons and ions move freely enough to cancel out the voltage, once the plasma approaches an object such as the Earth is slows and bunches up. Then you get into an area of science filled with currents.
[Reply]
Here is some information you may find useful: strong nuclear forces behave as if they were very weak, because the kinetic energy of 2 nucleons that stay within strong force range is greater than the depth of the potential well holding them together. This kinetic energy is (1/2) u v^2 > or = h^2 / 8 u R^2, where u is is reduced mass = m1m2/(m1 +m2) and R is distance between nucleons. h is Planck’s constant. Hope this helps.
[Reply]
I’m sorry to bother you.
But do you happen to know the equation for distance and the strong nuclear force ?
If it is an inverse square relation too, then I am misunderstanding something about forces, which I would like to learn.
[Reply]
Hi Definitionofis,
Newton’s law of gravity and Coulomb’s law of electromagnetism are identical. F = GmM / r2 and F = kqQ / r2. Both forces drop off as the square of the distance, but while Newton uses mass, Coulomb uses charges. Newton discovered his law 99 years before Coulomb. Coincidence?
[Reply]
The strong force which holds protons together is also stronger, than electric charge at a close distance of less than 2.5 proton diameters. So I guess some forces do not weaken at the same ratio to distance as do others. What is the relation of distance to gravity versus distance to electric charge or magnetism ?
[Reply]
What the name of the song from minute 3:48.
[Reply]
Any physicist will tell you that the electromagnetic force is 10^39 times more powerful than the gravitational force. That’s a thousand billion billion billion billion times stronger. So what forces control the Universe — gravitational or electrical? Every electric current produces a magnetic field, and you can’t have one without the other.
[Reply]
Hmmm.. That should be “scientists” and not “scientist” in my first post.
[Reply]
Another wrongful assumption is that the “non-thermal” radiation all comes from synchrotron radiation. Inverse compton scattering is something that is viewed increasingly as an important effect. For theorise of synchrotron radiation, see for example Fabbiano et al: “An X-ray survey of a complete sample of 3CR radio galaxies” (1984, ApJ), for an argumentation of inverse compton scattering, I refer to Laskar et al: “Inverse Compton X-rays from Giant Radio Galaxies at z~1″ (2009 arXiv)
[Reply]
This is outright stupidity! There are no “main stream astronomers” that I know of, that are totally disregarding the elements of electromagnetism. And the analogy with calling a flashlight a water spout is incredibly ignorant. Water is not connect to light as magnetism is to currents. I can agree that the nomenclature is sometimes not very intuitive, but it does not mean that people are wrong. Scientists do not just listen to a name and go from that. At least not the scientist I know.
[Reply]
“Filamentary, my dear Watson!”
Superb video, pervaded by empirical truths.
[Reply]
I remember this song from back in the day. It was on a ministry of sound compilation but I can’t remember the name.
[Reply]
Totally off topic, but who’s behind the music in your vids? its good stuff, especially this one, I’d love to know the name of the song and the artist behind it, thanks.
And I have to say the EU model seems a damn sight more sensical than the relitavistic model thats the mainstream.
[Reply]
What’s the song? Elegant video as well…
Wishing there was further investigation into these matters…
See my videos “Inquiry into the implications of reality”
[Reply]
Must everything be a government conspiracy!?
I highly doubt that anyone in Politics has figured this out and is keeping it from us merely as a means to rub our noses in it..
Religious leaders doubly so! The Big Bang model could prove to be correct one day but I feel it is in danger of becoming a doctrine rather than a hypothesis.
[Reply]
Great man! Great vid!
[Reply]