Who Is God?

This article is dedicated to Mr. Bhimsen Panda, my role model & teacher, who have been a source of inspiration & support for me. Sir, this is for you.

Who is God? I think this is by far the most controversial or most asked question of all time which had largely affected our way of thinking. God is our creator, a being which is responsible for the beginning of our universe. Throughout the history, people have been giving many ideas or views. In response to these ideas, people started to believe in some forms of powers which rule the cosmos. After the formation of human civilization, people started to break apart within many believes which is called religion. Today there are Christianity, Islam, Hinduism & Buddhism as major religions along with other kind of minor religions. Every religion has its ideas about the nature. Each & every religion believes in different forms of superpower. All these are OK till social level, but when it comes to science, all these are dismissed. Science doesn’t believe in creator or God because there’s no experimental prove of existence of any kind of super being throughout the universe. Science makes God meaningless. Almost no scientist believes in God. All are atheist. But there’re still few of them, who keep believe in a creator. Prof. Stephen Hawking, regarded as one of the greatest physicist & cosmologist of the century, said in his book The Grand Design that science makes God unnecessary. Only the laws of nature rule. Now I want to be a scientist (astrophysicist) in future. So what view do I hold?

Few years ago, I wasn’t thinking on all these matters as I was too young. But all of a sudden, some days or months earlier, I started to think on the topic. Who is our God? Who created us? The top most priority goes to laws of nature. So, for me laws of nature is the creator or God. Every where we see, every thing is dominated by laws of nature. But still questions arise, was there … Continue reading …

Space:Our Next Home-II

What are the main steps? : How space science will become the basis OF existence OF LIFE

We’ve the problems of expedition to space. But no solutions to these nagging problems. Without any solution it’ll be impossible to go to space & we all have to die violently on earth. This is a matter of concern. But I think that we can advance some of our present fields to get the solution. What we have to do is to develop & repair space science. Space science is the study of everything beyond earth’s atmosphere. Space science consists of following basic disciplines:

1. Astronomy:

i) Astrophysics.

ii)  Planetary Science.

iii)  Exobiology.

2. Aerospace:

i) Aeronautical Engineering

ii) Astronautics

3 . Space colonization:

i)  Space colonization justification.

ii) Space colony location

iii) Space colonization agriculture

iv)  Space colony construction etc.

4. Space Defense

These are the fields of space science. Basically, we’ve Astronomy which further consists of Astrophysics, Planetary Science & Exobiology. Then, we’ve Aerospace which also consists of Aeronautical Engineering & Astronautics. Then, we’ve Space colonization which consists of Space colonization justification, Space colonization agriculture etc. At last, we’ve Space defense which doesn’t consists of any specified sub-fields. Note here that some of these subfields have more subfields. As not important for our present discussion, we’ll not mention them. These are the subjects. Now, these all subjects are the basis of space science & the basis of existence of life in future (after 200 years). What we have to do is to develop all these subjects & repair it whenever needed. Though these are the developed fields, there’re more to be developed.

Among these list, Astronomy is most developed. The developments in this field are   rapid. Though, there are developments, there are still more developments to be done in this area. Astronomy is the detailed study of celestial objects.

Next is Aerospace. It second most developed. Though there are rapid developments in this field, there are necessarily more to be done. Aerospace is the study of instruments needed both for Astronomy & Astronautics.

Then Space colonization is third most developed. … Continue reading …

Space:Our Next Home-I

Earth was our home, is our home. But will it be our home tomorrow, in our future? It’s a question among scientists. It’s also among every people & it should be a matter of discussion among every terrestrial being. As discussed in my last post, Life: The Greatest Masterpiece OF The Universe, earth is a place where every situation is favorable for life to exist. After the long searching of nature, nature found earth to seed life. But after the notorious deed of human beings, life on earth is no more possible. The existence of life on earth is a matter of question. By the human activities, existence of life on earth is not possible to live. Almost 80% of the earth is polluted. So, living on such a place is not possible until 200 years or so. This idea is what told by British Astrophysicist & Cosmologist, Prof. Stephen Hawking. He told that living on earth is not worth full. After 200 years, we have to leave the earth. Earth will totally destroyed by another centuries. Prof. Hawking, in 50^th anniversary NASA lecture told that space is what our next destination. It bears no meaning to waste more money on earth. Earth will not be suitable to live. So, better we should use our economy in space. He said.

These saying of Stephen Hawking are not lie or fiction. It’s a fact. We see that everywhere there are pollutions. Pollution is something which will not leave us until we leave them. But the time end. Nature gave chances for us several times. But we humans had not taken care of it. We just underestimated all of them. But this is our last chance. We will not get chances anymore. 80% of our earth is destroyed. In the following years, we’ll complete these 20%. And after that do you know what will happen? We’ll get such hostile, dangerous & cruel death which we have not ever imagined. It would be more dreadful than nightmare or most horror movies. We pollute our mother earth in various innumerable ways. Sometimes, we … Continue reading …

What Will Be The Fate Of The Universe?

Every one of us wonders what will be the end of the universe? How it’ll end? As the big bang was the beginning of the universe, what’ll be the fate of the universe? Earlier, we gave concentration on the beginning of the universe much more, now we are giving some more attentions on the fate of the universe (though scientific researches & concentrations are still going on). This question is more common among astrophysicist & cosmologists.

For the kind information of readers, I’d like to introduce the definition of cosmologist & cosmology. Cosmologists are actually astrophysicists who study cosmology as their special research field. And cosmology is the sub-part of astrophysics which is the study of the whole universe as a whole in large-scales, its origin, end, future developments & nature. For more information, Prof. Stephen Hawking of Cambridge University, the greatest physicist of the era after Albert Einstein, is also a cosmologist. His field concentrates on cosmology.

It’s a matter of discussions among top cosmologists around the globe that what’d be the probable end of the universe. We’ve well got a good idea on the beginning of the universe. But there are still a lot to know about the universe.

So, let’s begin a journey through the deepest of the fate of the universe unveiling the greatest mysteries of the universe where truth is much stranger than the reality. In the beginning of the century, scientists have developed a good insight on the end of the universe. Although, there are a lot of controversies, cosmologists have sorted out some of the best theories.

At the very beginning, we’ll discuss thebig crunch theory. Big crunch theory is a theory which states that the universe will end in a collision course. As estimated by Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) in 2001 that the 26% of the universe is filled with matter particles (22% non-baryonic & 4% baryonic), we expect that the universe will end by a collision by gravity. The idea is that after expanding the universe to a critical state, the universe will start to collapse … Continue reading …

The way I look My Universe

This book is all about my point of view how I look our universe.

You will see the working of our universe in my point of view.

So the book is named the way I look my universe. Every member whether living and non living objects of the universe has the rights to comment on it.

If every member is agreed of my point of view then the name becomes “The way we look our Universe”.

That’s my goal.

This book is dedicated to my parents.

Animesh Sahu

 

My  Concept:

The whole universe follows some common rule.

1. Every Thing that starts in the universe goes to maximum and comes to minimum. That means the universe tries to maintain a balance between 2 opposite things. The maximum and minimum for any system is driven by the force factor involved in the system.

The example of 2 opposite things are :

KE(Kinetic Energy) & PE(Potential Energy)

Lets go to Big Bank theory of Universe creation :

There was a point . Due to a blast in the point the universe is created and it is expanding.

The blast occurred due to the energy that I call as the force factor (The unbalancing force).

It is the extra energy which will not allow the universe to keep in a static state anymore.

Or the extra energy is so much that the universe will never come back for contraction.

I believe in the 1^st probability and also I will prove it.

1. Universe is isolated system. What ever the work done no matter it will a PE is developed which will lead to contraction.

1. There is another way to prove, there are many systems and subsystems and sub-subsystems etc are present in the Universe. Universe is the main system, galaxy is subsystem, Solar System is sub-subsystem and Earth is sub-sub-subsystem and so on.

The way a subsystem will behave is the replica of system functionality. Any subsystem starts goes to maximum and comes back to minimum. The whole force factor is distributed among the system and subsystem and so on. The force … Continue reading …

hi, am a new memeber to your physics family

Helloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo from M M QAZI

” Knowledge is Network

&

I am on the network

to share”

Incoming search terms:

• geography am

… Continue reading …

Our thoughts are with our friends in Japan

Japan was today struck by the most powerful earthquake in its recorded history. We saw terrible scenes of devastation in the news. We send our condolences to  those that lost loved ones in the earthquake and tsunami. Our thoughts, prayers and best wishes are with the people of Japan. May all bad things come to an end. May there be a new beginning.

Incoming search terms:

• www thoughts

… Continue reading …

Fermilab descobre top quarks raro!

Batavia, Ill.-cientistas do CDF e DZero Colaborations do Department of Energy’s Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory observaram colisões de partículas que produzem um top quarks raro. A descoberta dessa partícula confirma parâmetros importantes da física de partículas, incluindo o número total de quarks, e tem a sua importância no andamento da pesquisa da partícula de Higgs no Fermilab’s Tevatron, atualmente o mais poderoso acelerador de partículas em operação do mundo.

Anteriormente, top quarks só havia sido observado quando produzidos pela força nuclear forte. Essa interação leva à produção de pares de top quarks. A produção desses top quarks raros, que envolve a força nuclear fraca e é mais difícil de identificar experimentalmente, já foi observada, quase 14 anos atrás (em 1995).

Procurar esse top quarks raro faz a tarefa de encontrar uma agulha no palheiro parecer simples. Apenas uma em cada 20 mil milhões de colisão entre prótons-antiprótons produz esse quark singular. Ainda pior, o sinal destas ocorrências raras é facilmente imitado por outros processos de fundo que ocorrem a taxas muito mais elevadas.

“Observação da produção do top quark raro é um marco importante para o programa Tevatron”, disse o Dr. Dennis Kovar, Diretor Associado do Instituto da Ciência Física de Altas Energias dos E.U. Departamento de Energia. “Além disso, a análise altamente sensível e bem sucedida é um passo importante na busca pelo Higgs.”

Descobrir a produção do top quarks raro apresenta um desafio similar ao de descobrir o Bóson de Higgs, na pesquisa a necessidade de extrair um sinal extremamente pequeno de um grande plano de fundo. Análise técnicas avançadas e pioneiras usadas para descoberta desse singular Quakr agora estão em uso para a pesquisa do bóson de Higgs. Além disso, o sinal do quark singular e ao Higgs têm origens em comum, e o singular top é em si um único fundo para a partícula Higgs.

Para fazerem a descoberta desse top quarks raro, físicos do CDF e DZero Colaborations passaram anos pesquisando independentemente através dos resultados de colisões de prótons-antiprótons registradas por seus experimentos, respectivamente. Cada equipe identificou vários milhares de colisões que mostraram a forma … Continue reading …

Stop the LHC – until we know it’s SAFE!

That is what LHCDefense.org – the self-proclaimed “official site for citizens against the Large Hadron Collider” – exhorts us to do, through articles such as Curiosity killed the cat!, New paper contradicts Hawking, and Higgs vs. Hawking.

A hot new niche

Using everything from “expert” opinions, research papers on arxiv, and biblical verses, the website’s creator(s) have cunningly played upon the layperson’s paranoia of the “mad/evil scientist/Dr. Strangelove” cliché to sensationalize the issue and in the process have created a sizable following for the website, not to mention a good deal of publicity.

LHCDefense.org is by no means the only website cashing in on this hot new niche; there is a plethora of sites that have espoused LHC-bashing and proffer their myriad points of view to the anxious reader in exchange for some PR juice. lhcfacts.org and bigsciencenews.blogspot.com are good examples.

These websites’ main contentions are that the theory that black holes radiate is flawed, and if they do so, they do so at a very gentle rate even at the end-stage, and that Lord Hawking was daft after all. Or something like that. They tom-tom the fact that a guy with a masters’ degree in statistics did a Delphi study of a group of “physicists” and supposedly found that their estimates that Hawking radiation would fail ranged from 0% to 50%. Yeah, right. Let’s introduce democracy in physics.

 

Panic on the streets of Meyrin

 

We have been rushed into some hasty, ill-informed decisions in our time – we emailed our bank details to our new friend in Nigeria who had $26m to smuggle out of the country by midnight, switched from Google to Bing after seeing those TV adverts and just this May we stuck $225 on the Cape Caterpillars to win the International Premier League of cricket. But even those little jaunts look like feats of Socratic reasoning when you compare them to the rumors slouching out of LHCDefense.org. If they’re to be believed, a CERN scientist has predicted that a “miracle” will preclude the … Continue reading …