<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Hawking radiation give rise to Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.actaphysica.com/blog/worth-a-look/can-hawking-radiation-give-rise-to-ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.actaphysica.com/post-archive/can-hawking-radiation-give-rise-to-ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays/</link>
	<description>Latest developments in the world of physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 08:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dyau</title>
		<link>http://www.actaphysica.com/post-archive/can-hawking-radiation-give-rise-to-ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actaphysica.com/?p=26#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your your suggestion, JTankers. I didn&#039;t know 10% physicists doubted the existence of Hawking Radiation. It&#039;s never been detected because we do not have the luxury, so far, of playing with black holes in the lab!

I am one of those who firmly believe in HR. But yes, you are right, one could use the more politically correct phrasing you have suggested.

Do join us at http://www.actaphysica.com !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your your suggestion, JTankers. I didn&#8217;t know 10% physicists doubted the existence of Hawking Radiation. It&#8217;s never been detected because we do not have the luxury, so far, of playing with black holes in the lab!</p>
<p>I am one of those who firmly believe in HR. But yes, you are right, one could use the more politically correct phrasing you have suggested.</p>
<p>Do join us at <a href="http://www.actaphysica.com"  rel="nofollow">http://www.actaphysica.com</a> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thiago</title>
		<link>http://www.actaphysica.com/post-archive/can-hawking-radiation-give-rise-to-ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Thiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actaphysica.com/?p=26#comment-3</guid>
		<description>JTankers join the discussion. www.actaphysica.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JTankers join the discussion. <a href="http://www.actaphysica.com"  rel="nofollow">http://www.actaphysica.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTankers</title>
		<link>http://www.actaphysica.com/post-archive/can-hawking-radiation-give-rise-to-ultra-high-energy-cosmic-rays/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>JTankers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actaphysica.com/?p=26#comment-2</guid>
		<description>You state &quot;we know...&quot; but a more correct statement might be &quot;most scientists believe that Hawking radiation is probably emitted by all black holes&quot;.

A 2004 delphi study found 10% average doubt amoung physicists polled that Hawking Radiation would actually be found to exist.

Hawking Radiation was theorized about 35 years ago but never detected and several papers refute the theory. HR may exist, it may not.  It is generally accepted and expected but unknown for certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You state &#8220;we know&#8230;&#8221; but a more correct statement might be &#8220;most scientists believe that Hawking radiation is probably emitted by all black holes&#8221;.</p>
<p>A 2004 delphi study found 10% average doubt amoung physicists polled that Hawking Radiation would actually be found to exist.</p>
<p>Hawking Radiation was theorized about 35 years ago but never detected and several papers refute the theory. HR may exist, it may not.  It is generally accepted and expected but unknown for certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/17 queries in 0.050 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 554/559 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.actaphysica.com @ 2012-02-08 18:37:19 -->
