Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics Reviews

Comments

1. Vijay Krishna says:

   September 30, 2010 at 10:30 pm

   Review by Vijay Krishna for Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics
   Rating:
   I cannot deny the fact that this is a well-written book. But the authors had a way of getting on my nerves for the gradation between the examples and the exercise problems was too steep that if you did not grasp the underlying concept in the first place, you never ever will understand it. Most of my friends felt that way too. However that does not mean that the book is not good. At times you will be flabbergasted at how well the authors can push a difficult concept through. The section on ‘Dynamics’ was perhaps one of the best in contemporary entry-level texts on the subject.

   [Reply]

   Reply
2. a reader says:

   September 30, 2010 at 10:36 pm

   Review by a reader for Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics
   Rating:
   This is really a great book in a hard to grasp subject.It is easy to follow ,has a lot of excellent sample problems and examples ,student-friendly and it is ideal for selfstudy.

   [Reply]

   Reply
3. Greg Freeman says:

   September 30, 2010 at 11:31 pm

   Review by Greg Freeman for Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics
   Rating:
   I was forced into purchasing this group of books for my university engineering program as all of the homework problems required were straight from this book.Additionally, the books were packaged with schaums problem sets that were particularly useless (schaums outlines are usually excellent, but their problem sets did not contain all of the detail and had nothing extra to offer over Beer and Johnston’s textbook) and therefore a waste of my money.With that said, the only redeeming value of this book is the sheer number of exercises and answers (numerical answers with no explanation, however).The writing quality suffers what english majors call overuse of passive voice. Overuse of the words “is,” “will,” “are,” etc. characterize this style. With the lack of acting verbs in sentences, the book effectively numbs the mind and puts the reader to sleep. This passive use of verbage also serves to take the emphasis off of the important parts of sentences.Aside from stylistic issues with the english language, the book also suffers from a lack of vision. The authors did not provide a good methodology to approaching problems at all. They hint at it, by telling the student to draw pictures. However, in examples, the authors jump from one step to the next without much explanation of how a person would discover the techniques themselves. This makes the homework problems particularly difficult when a completely different approach than the one in the examples is required.There are also derivation and explanation issues. For instance, in the handling of the precession of free bodies (this example sticks out in particular), the author provides a diagram and some equations. However, students cannot precede merely from what the author explained. The student, in order to approach the problems, must assume the validity of the vector diagrams and their relationships, along with equations, seperately. The diagrams and equations WERE NOT UNIFIED in the discussion. This gives the impression that the authors seperately wrote different parts of the book, and later simply pasted the pieces together without any greater plan.I would not recommend these books as something colleges should use.

   [Reply]

   Reply
4. Anonymous says:

   October 1, 2010 at 12:17 am

   Review by for Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics
   Rating:
   This is the text used in my current undergrad Statics class. Like many of these texts, this book is written so only teachers or students who have already completed the course might understand the explanations and sample problems. If you have a teacher who does not explain the material in an understandable way, like I do, this book will be no help. There is no solutions manual to supplement the few examples given in the chapters.I have had straight B’s in 3 undergrad Phyisics courses, and 2 A’s and 2 B’s in 3 unergrad Calculus courses and Diff Eq. I am nearly lost with this book and looking for supplemental learning materials.

   [Reply]

   Reply
5. Anonymous says:

   October 1, 2010 at 12:42 am

   Review by for Vector Mechanics for Engineers, Statics and Dynamics
   Rating:
   I must disagree with what the other reviewers have said. This book is the best book I have ever come across for Mechanics. The approach is pictorial and problem-solving techniques are marvellously illustrated. There is an enormous amount of well-graded problems, so if you cant solve one problem on your own then you have many more to try. A Bible for Mechanics.

   [Reply]

   Reply

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Click here to cancel reply.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

CAPTCHA Code *

Click to cancel reply